Father Tom Boyer

Archdiocese of Oklahoma City, retired in Naples, Florida

  • Homily
  • Presentations
  • Retreats
  • About – Resume
  • Contact

The 22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time

Posted by Father Tom Boyer on September 2, 2012
Posted in: Homily.

Deuteronomy 4: 1-2, 6-8 + Psalm 15 + James 1: 17-18, 21-27 + Mark 7: 1-8, 14-15,21-23

         As a child I often got into trouble because I would ask a certain question. I honestly think it is a phase everyone goes through in growing up. I would ask the question and then often end up sitting in my room for a while to contemplate the answer: “Because I said so.” It never seemed like a good answer to me until I started to need it, which is, I guess, the first stage of moving out of that phase. I asked the question in the seminary a lot, and it would draw looks of suspicion from those in charge. That has not changed either. The question of course, is “Why”

         When it comes to this part of Mark’s Gospel, there is a little trouble brewing over the law and following the law, and the trouble reveals for us a real tension that exists not between the law and freedom, but between the outside and the inside – a tension that is experienced in the very living of the law and answering the question “why” in the face of the law.

         The Pharisees are a good example of that tension gone wrong. They were not typical of all Jews. I often call the Book of Deuteronomy from which we read first today a “Love Song to the Law”.

The mood and the spirit in which it is written is almost a poem that would describe the love of God’s Law – a Love that generates and sustains the very Love that is God. Staying in a right relationship to the Law puts one in a position of love. If you catch on to what the Book of Deuteronomy proposes you begin to get the idea that God’s love for God’s people is the source of the law because it leads to the Covenant. Our Love for God is expressed and lived in that covenant and the keeping of, loving of, and observance of the Law.

         Now, that is an entirely interior idea. I like to call it a matter of the heart, and so it is the heart that determines how one keeps the law, why, and what comes from keeping the law. A loving and pure heart makes keeping the law a joy. But a tension arises when the focus shifts from the interior to the exterior, and I think that is what Jesus is talking about to his disciples using the Pharasees as his example. The Pharasees were focused was on the external expression of the law rather than the internal loving and living of the law. For them it did not matter how you felt, or what was in your heart. All that concerned them was a following the rules. If anyone asked them, “Why should we wash our hands?” their answer would have been: “Because it says so.” leaving the one who asked the question cold and distant from the law. Had they made some connection between a clean heart and clean hands and suggested that the cleaning of the hands be connected to a cleansing of the soul, the tension could have resolved into a wonderful moment of conversion.

         This tension still exists today, and it has all the potential to turn us into Pharasees or lead us to deeper conversion, great joy, and love in our covenant with God. So, we have the Law of God. Why? Because it is God’s way of revealing God’s Will for us and leading us to be all that God wishes us and has imagined us to be. Why is there a law that says: Thou Shalt Not Kill? Now think with your heart, and don’t say because, “Because God said so.” That’s outside thinking. Inside thinking with the heart says: “Because wherever there is Life there is God, and the taking of any life diminishes the presence of God in this world. Because God is the creator of all life, destroying life destroys God’s last and best work of creation.” Why is there a rule that says: “Missing Mass on Sunday is wrong?” What do you say to a child that asks, “Why do we have to go?” Think with your heart. Only say “Because I said so if it’s a contest of the will.” The real answer when you’re not in a power struggle is: “Because we have been invited, and Jesus asked us to come and do this in his memory; because it is how we stay together with the Risen Christ and with others who love us.” Or perhaps a shorter answer from the heart is: “Because we can, not because we have to.” Why do we have to share? The heart says: “Because that is why God gave us what we have….because nothing we have is our own….. because it brings joy and happiness to others.” This is heart talk – it is what come from within.

         The whole speech of Moses to the people as he delivered the Law to them was touched with joy and hope because he knew that God’s Law was the expression of God’s Love, and the keeping of that law would keep the Israelites within the embrace of God as no other nation or people could ever hope to experience. Rather than complain, avoid, and reluctantly keep the law, we might be tempted by the tension between right and wrong, obedience and disobedience, to ask why, and then from a heart filled with the Spirit of God begin follow the words of James today in the second reading: “Humbly welcome the word that has been planted in you and is able to save your souls. Be doers of the word and not hears only.”

In the practice of our faith, the goal must be to internalize the law and the will of God for us so that we do not even think about the details of the law because we have so embraced it, so loved it, and so understood what the law is that we shall live the law, not keep the law or ever need to enforce the law. It has always seemed to me that enforcers of the law are the ones who have not yet themselves internalized the law. They are stuck on the outside fussing with the details while all the while never coming close to the God who is finally revealed within the Law within one’s heart.

Posts navigation

← The 21st Sunday in Ordinary Time
25th Sunday of Ordinary Time →
  • Recent Posts

    • The Twenty-fifth Sunday in Ordinary Time
    • The Twenty-fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time
    • The Twenty-third Sunday in Ordinary Time
    • The Twenty-second Sunday in Ordinary Time
    • The Twenty-first Sunday in Ordinary Time
  • Archives

    • September 2026
    • August 2026
    • July 2026
    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • August 2002
    • July 2002
    • June 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    • March 2002
    • February 2002
    • January 2002
    • December 2001
    • November 2001
    • October 2001
    • September 2001
    • August 2001
    • July 2001
    • June 2001
    • May 2001
    • April 2001
    • March 2001
    • February 2001
    • January 2001
    • December 2000
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Parament by Automattic.