Father Tom Boyer

Archdiocese of Oklahoma City, retired in Naples, Florida

  • Homily
  • Presentations
  • Retreats
  • About – Resume
  • Contact

The Twenty-fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time

Posted by Father Tom Boyer on September 12, 2021
Posted in: Homily.

September 12, 2021 I am in St Louis this weekend. This homily will not be delivered.

Isaiah 50, 5-9 + Psalm 116 + James 2, 14-18 + Mark 8, 27-35

We are at the exact center point of Mark’s Gospel. Until now, Jesus and his disciples have been traveling to the villages of the countryside and up into Galilee. They have stopped for a moment at the ultimate seat of Roman power. The place where this episode takes place is important. We are at Caesarea Philippi. It is a place with great imperial history. The Caesars who built and lavished riches upon this place see themselves as gods who rule and bless their subjects through their imperial structured world. There was a gleaming Temple there built by a people who created their god in their own image. At this place, at this point in Mark’s Gospel, Peter’s confession competes with Imperial claims as he identifies Jesus as the Messiah. With that, a conflict begins. At first, it is a conflict of ideas and expectations. Later it becomes a conflict that is violent and deadly. The traveling around the countryside is over. They now turn toward Jerusalem where the conflict will erupt into the open and finally be resolved……… but not quite.

This resolution can never be complete until everyone of us answers the question the Jesus asks: “Who do you say that I am?” As long as our answer is tainted by Caesarea Philippi images and ideas of that god, there will be no resolution. In spite of his declaration, Peter and his companions were still caught up in the conflict. His refusal to hear and accept what Jesus says next reveals what’s going on inside of them.

What Jesus wanted from his disciples he still wants from us; an openness to what he is about to tell them. Peter had the right answer, but the wrong idea or expectation of what a Messiah, God’s anointed one, was to be. Not until the Resurrection would they understand the central mystery of salvation through self-sacrificing love.

Even today, like Peter did then, we all resist what Jesus says and does. It simply does not match our expectation of power and our created idea of how God should work among us. Too often we want a “Caesar-God”. What is consistently revealed to us is a loving, compassionate, self-sacrificing God who instead of destroying enemies waits, watches, and forgives with an amnesty that is hard for us to understand, and Jesus asks for openness to what he has to say and do.

We resist suffering. For some it’s the end of their relationship with God. Yet, when something happens that’s good, we are quick to say: “Thank you, God.” The Messiah that Peter had yet to understand was a Messiah connected not just with power and joy, but with suffering and death. It was not that Jesus was to suffer because of some mistakes he made: That’s retribution. Nor did he seek suffering as if it was a virtue: That’s sadism. Like many who suffer, he had led a morally good life, and on that score, he did not deserve to suffer.

It seems to me that Peter’s shortcoming was his failure to listen to the Prophet we just heard referring to the Messiah as a suffering servant. This “servant” is all of us, the People of God, who can overcome evil by good, violence by love, war by peace-making.  We see today a Jesus who is still be tempted to take the crown without the cross. We see him speak to Peter and call him “Satan” reminding us as he was reminded that Satan and temptations are never gone for good, and sometimes they speak to us in the voice of a friend.

Being tempted to look for someone with power and shaping our concept of God. We find it easier to believe in a distant God of power than in the Suffering Servant of Isaiah who cries out in pain on the crosses of the world and suffers in humanity. Opening ourselves to the mystery of the God Jesus reveals reminds and comforts us with the simple truth that a well-lived life has both joy and sorrow. 

None of this makes any sense at all until the Resurrection when it is made known to us how God thinks and how God acts. By human reasoning, the cross makes no sense – what good could come out of defeat, humiliation, and death we ask? But God’s thinking is different, and so, like Peter and his companions, we are called to conversion of mind and to take up a completely divine way of thinking with the conviction that love always will triumph and God can and will make all things new.

Posts navigation

← The Exaltation of the Holy Cross
The Twenty-fifth Sunday in Ordinary Time →
  • Recent Posts

    • Trinity Sunday
    • Pentecost
    • The Ascension of the Lord
    • Easter 6
    • Easter 5
  • Archives

    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • March 2011
    • December 2010
    • October 2005
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • August 2002
    • July 2002
    • June 2002
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Parament by Automattic.