Father Tom Boyer

Archdiocese of Oklahoma City, retired in Naples, Florida

  • Homily
  • Presentations
  • Retreats
  • About – Resume
  • Contact

The Third Sunday in Lent March 23, 2014

Posted by Father Tom Boyer on March 21, 2014
Posted in: Homily.

SAINT JOSEPH OLD CATHEDRAL, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

Exodus 17, 3-7 + Psalm 95 + Romans 5, 1-2, 5-8 + John 4, 5-42

John says that Jesus “had to pass” through Samaria to get from Judea to Galilee because something was going on with baptisms by his disciples in Galilee. There was probably a little competition between disciples of John and disciples of Jesus over who could baptize the most. At any rate, Jesus is headed to Galilee which is north of Judea with Samaria in between. It was probably the shortest way and may have had the best road. It would be like going to Stillwater up I-35 meaning you would have to pass through Logan County. However, there was hostility between Samaritans and Jews, and unless you were in a big hurry, it would be better to go another way. It was possible to go a little to east and up the Jordan River through Perea and the region of the Decapolis. Bethany was in Perea and well known to Jesus as well as the region of the Decapolis which we know he has visited before. He knew the way. So, this suggestion that he “had to” go through Samaria does not mean it was the only way. He went there for another reason, not because he had to get away from the Pharisees in Judea and go to Galilee to straighten out those disciples; but because he had to make an offer to a representative of marginalized people. “If you only knew the gift of God” he thinks to himself, and off he goes

I think that this awareness is important for reflecting upon these verses. He did not go there to pick a fight or because he was in a hurry. He went there to be present to and reveal himself to outsiders, enemies of the Jews, and even more so, to a woman, an unaccompanied woman whose reputation was scandalous. We know all of that even before the conversation begins, and knowing this then gives us more to reflect upon than simply the words of the text.

After years of living with this story and after more than forty-five years of reflecting upon it in church, I see something new this year. It occurs to me that there are three encounters with Jesus in this story: a private one with the woman at the well, another with the disciples who return with the groceries, and a third encounter when the woman comes back with a crowd of folks. Look at the difference between what each group brings!

The first encounter is a deeply personal one that tells a conversion story in which this woman moves from hostility to curiosity and on to faith. Her conversion moves along through her conversation with Christ who unconditionally accepts her without any judgment about her past. He treats her with respect. She has some dignity in his sight, and she listens. What seems to matter is the present moment when two enemies face one another, and when a sinner meets the savior. It is uncomplicated and grace filled. Never mind the past. Never mind the fact that Jews and Samaritans are hostile over religious and political issues. What matters is that they speak, they listen, they care not about ideologies, but about one another. One is thirsty. One has a bucket, but she is thirsty too, but not for water. They both end up satisfied. The Pharisees have rejected Jesus. The Samaritans have accepted him. She has longed for a Messiah and thirsted for dignity and man who would stay with her. They both end up fulfilled.

Then comes the second encounter which I think stands in sharp contrast to the third. The disciples come to Jesus full of their opinions and judgments about Jesus who does not seem, in their opinion, to know what he’s doing and who he has been talking with. They bring groceries and suggest that he eat something they have brought. He refuses. In contrast to them comes a crowd led by the woman who said: “Come and see a man who told me everything I have ever done.” The disciples return with groceries. The woman returns with a crowd of people who left the city to see him. What I find amazing is that this Samaritan woman is a more successful evangelist than these disciples, and we ought to wonder how it is so. Perhaps John’s complex stories are open to a variety of interpretation and layers of meaning. Each one of them is a capsule of the whole Gospel. John is a master of symbolism and detail. This happens at noon. Other things happen at noon as well in the Gospel, and we can connect the dots. Water opens up any number of avenues to explore more of this text. The well itself is very symbolic, and that well is historically important. He says: “Give me a drink.” and he will say that again on a cross. John is doing more here at this point of his Gospel than continuing to reveal the divine plan for salvation in his dramatic and complex story.

As we, the church, listen again to these verses at an age in history when we are being led into a time of new evangelization, there is no excuse for failing to see and learn something about evangelization in these verses. Here she is, both a convert and an evangelist. We can learn from her. We can see again the power unleashed in us when we know that in spite of all we have ever done, God loves, respects, and treats us with dignity. We can see again how once we listen to Christ, to the Word of God, and come from that conversation into a trusting relationship with Christ nothing can stop us from spreading the news and offering to share that gift of faith we sometimes do not know is there. Then, look at the way she awakens the others to the gift. What a wonderful model of evangelization! Once she asks about the Messiah and Jesus replies: “I am he,” her faith comes to fullness. All that is left is for her to become an apostle to her people. She leaves the water jar. That is a startling detail. Water jars are important. That jar is what sustained her in the past. Her presence among her people is all it takes. Her words are not particularly persuasive or for that matter very important, just her presence. You can sense the joy in her, the freedom she has found, and the desire that comes out with the words: “Come and See.” What they first see is her joy, and instead of telling them what to believe or how to behave, she simply asks a question, and they leave their town and everything it means. There is John’s lesson to a church that is awakening to the spirit of evangelization. It is a spirit of joy and of freedom, and it comes from recognizing the gift of faith that we have.

Posts navigation

← The Second Sunday in Lent March 16, 2014
The Fourth Sunday in Lent March 30, 2014 St James the Greater Catholic Church, Oklahoma City, OK →
  • Recent Posts

    • Trinity Sunday
    • Pentecost
    • The Ascension of the Lord
    • Easter 6
    • Easter 5
  • Archives

    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • March 2011
    • December 2010
    • October 2005
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • August 2002
    • July 2002
    • June 2002
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Parament by Automattic.